Two Memos in One Day

I am delaying my planned post because of important news:By early afternoon on Thursday, April 23, two of the five most valuable companies in the world had told their employees the same thing in different words. Meta's internal memo — first reported by Reuters and confirmed by Bloomberg — announced that approximately 8,000 employees, roughly 10% of its 78,865-person global workforce, will be laid off starting 20 May. Another 6,000 open roles will go unfilled. Hours later, Microsoft memoed its own staff that, for the first time in the company's 51-year history, it was offering voluntary retirement buyouts to roughly 7% of its U.S. workforce — about 8,750 people, per CNBC and Bloomberg. Both memos used the same word: efficiency. Both pointed to the same cause: AI infrastructure spending on a scale that has to be offset somewhere.

If you work in tech, neither memo is surprising. The industry has shed more than 95,000 jobs across 247 separate layoff events so far in 2026 — an average of 882 per day, and we are not yet a third of the way through the year. Amazon cut 16,000 in January. Oracle eliminated up to 30,000, roughly 18% of its workforce, to fund $156 billion in AI infrastructure. In a recent survey of U.S. hiring managers, 55% said they expect layoffs this year, and 44% cited AI as a primary driver.

This post is for the analytically-minded tech professional who has either already received the email or who is close enough to the news cycle to know it's coming.

The Pivot That Actually Works

I'll present the weak version of the argument first, because peddling a "just become a tax pro!" pipeline would insult the reader's intelligence.

Being good at distributed systems does not automatically make you good at tax work. The two disciplines share a temperament — patience with rules, comfort with specificity, willingness to chase an answer down until you find it — but the daily work is genuinely different. An enrolled agent spends most of her time preparing returns, responding to IRS notices, representing clients in audits and collections matters, and translating a client's messy real-world situation into numbers that survive IRS scrutiny. Less code-section reading than you might imagine; more client-facing judgment under time pressure. And that client-facing piece — managing someone who is anxious, disorganized, or both, and whose livelihood turns on you getting the answer right — takes time to learn. No amount of engineering seniority substitutes for it.

What does transfer is the habit of reducing messy situations to a clean logical structure. The willingness to read the manual. The ability to sit with a complex problem for hours without flinching. Those traits are rarer in tax practice than they should be, and every firm I've worked with or competed against would take the analytically-rigorous EA over the mediocre one every time.

One concession before moving on. A senior engineer clearing $350K at Meta will not replace that compensation as an entry-level EA, and any post that implied otherwise would be lying to you. What the credential offers is different: a license to build a practice, control your own time, and compound an asset you own. More on that toward the end.

The Open Door Nobody Talks About

Now for the part that makes the pivot practical instead of aspirational.

The CPA credential — the traditional gatekeeper of professional tax practice — requires 150 credit hours of education in most states. That's a bachelor's degree plus roughly a year of additional coursework, at an estimated extra cost of $15,000 to $50,000 and a full calendar year, before a candidate can even sit for the Uniform CPA Examination.

The IRS Enrolled Agent credential has no education requirement at all. None. The IRS does not care whether you hold a degree, whether your degree is in accounting, or whether you attended college. What the IRS does care about is whether you can pass the three-part Special Enrollment Examination — Individuals, Businesses, and Representation — and clear a background and tax-compliance check. The enrollment fee is $140. You need a Preparer Tax Identification Number. That's it.

This is not a lesser credential dressed up as a feature. The IRS itself describes enrolled agents as having "unlimited practice rights" before the agency — the same scope of representation authority granted to CPAs and attorneys. And because the credential is federal rather than state-issued, it is portable in a way no state license is: an EA licensed while living in Seattle can represent a client being audited in Miami without filing for a single additional credential. That national portability is unusual in American professional practice. It exists because Congress created the designation in 1884, long before the modern state-by-state accreditation regime, and the accessibility was never stripped out.

The Pull Side: A Profession That Cannot Keep Up

The open door is one side of the equation. The other side is that the professional tax ecosystem urgently needs more people in it.

The CPA pipeline is, in the AICPA's own language, a pipeline crisis. According to the 2025 AICPA/NASBA Trends Report and corroborating Bureau of Labor Statistics data: the number of unique candidates sitting for the CPA exam has declined more than 27% over the past decade. Accounting graduates hit a 20-year low in the most recent reporting year — down roughly 30% from the 2014–15 peak. Approximately 75% of current CPAs are at or near retirement age. The BLS projects between 124,200 and 136,400 annual openings in accounting and auditing through 2034, against roughly 55,000 accounting degrees awarded per year — and not all graduates pursue licensure or tax work specifically. More than 300,000 accountants and auditors exited the profession between 2020 and 2022 alone. In Robert Half's 2025 Talent Report, more than 90% of finance and accounting leaders said they cannot find enough qualified accounting professionals.

CPA firms are responding by outsourcing work to Latin America and India, raising starting salaries 10% in a single year, and turning clients away. EY announced a $1 billion, three-year workforce investment aimed at reversing the pipeline decline. The National Association of Enrolled Agents noted the consequence in a 2024 analysis: as fewer CPAs emerge to fill vacancies, the tax profession has begun absorbing the demand at the EA tier — and employers have been hiring accordingly.

The gap is not a forecast. It is a current condition.

The AI Argument, Compressed

I wrote last week about AI and the EA career. The short version bears repeating here because it changes the calculus for anyone pivoting in.

AI does eliminate the mechanical layer of tax work — retrieval, calculation, template application. If that were the whole of what a tax professional did, the case for pivoting in would be weak. But the accountability layer — the credentialed human who reviews the output, applies judgment to specific facts, signs the return, and can be sanctioned by the IRS if the answer is wrong — is not automatable. As AI-generated tax advice floods the zone, the professional who can audit it becomes more valuable, not less.

If you are laid off from a tech job that AI is replacing, and you are considering a credential that AI is not replacing, you are moving in the correct direction.

What the Path Actually Looks Like

The exam. PSI Services took over administration of the EA exam on 1 March 2026. Scheduling for the new cycle opens 1 May, and the first exams under PSI happen 1 July. PSI operates more than 550 test centers in the United States and, for the first time in the EA exam's history, is offering a remote-proctored option that lets you take the exam from home. (My own recommendation, covered in an earlier issue: let PSI work the bugs out on in-person administrations before you trust the home option.) The content is unchanged. Three parts. The One Big Beautiful Bill Act, signed in July 2025, becomes testable starting 1 May 2026 — make sure any prep materials you pay for are current.

A realistic six-month plan. Total study time for most candidates runs 300 to 400 hours across the three parts. A workable sequence for someone starting now:

  • Months 1–2: Part 1 (Individuals). The largest chunk of material and the most familiar territory for anyone who has filed personal returns. ~120 hours.

  • Month 3: Part 3 (Representation, Practices, and Procedures). The shortest and most procedural. Pair it with Part 1 in your mind — they share DNA around client interactions with the IRS. ~70 hours. I passed Parts 1 and 3 first, in that order, under the old regime. If I had to do it over, I would do the same.

  • Months 4–6: Part 2 (Businesses). The hardest, and the one that eats the time. Corporations, partnerships, S-corps, specialized business situations. ~150 hours.

Study four evenings a week plus a weekend morning and you are comfortably inside the six-month envelope. If you are between jobs with severance runway, three months is achievable with discipline. The three parts carry a rolling two-year credit window for each part passed, so there is slack if life intervenes.

The shingle option. This is the quiet part of the EA value proposition that rarely gets written down. Because the credential is federal and portable, and because client relationships in tax have gone substantially remote since 2020, a solo EA practice is one of the lowest-overhead professional services businesses in the United States. No office required. Professional tax software runs $500 to $2,000 a year. E&O insurance is modest. You can serve clients in any state, and the IRS's new remote-proctoring option is a quiet signal that the agency is comfortable with the profession operating from anywhere. Many EAs build seasonal preparation practices and layer year-round representation work — audit defense, collection matters, offers in compromise, amended returns — on top, to smooth the revenue curve.

The path is not glamorous. But for a laid-off tech professional with an emergency fund, the economics of "credential in six months, independent practice in twelve" are on a different planet from the economics of "retrain for another tech job and hope the next layoff passes you by."

Today's two memos are a signal. Not the first. Not the last. But a loud one, on a day when the contrast with the pull side of the tax market is especially sharp. If you are reading this and the timing feels uncomfortably close to the news cycle — that's the point.

Next post: How the EA exam is going to look under the new PSI regime.Does anybody know?

Keep Reading